The new findings show that Jupiter is slightly smaller than previously estimated – it’s about 8 km less wide at the equator and 24 km flatter at the poles. In other words, it’s more flattened compared to previous assessments. “Textbooks will need to be updated,” Kaspi says. “The size of Jupiter hasn’t changed, of course, but the way we measure it has.”
“These few kilometers matter,” Galanti explains. “Shifting the radius by just a little lets our models of Jupiter’s interior fit both the gravity data and atmospheric measurements much better.” This implication was tested by another PhD student in Kapsi’s group, Maayan Ziv. “We were in a unique position to use our state-of-the-art models for the interior density structure of Jupiter to show that the refined shape helps bridge the gap between the models and the measurements,” Ziv says. This study also has broader implications for understanding the structure of gas planets in general, since Jupiter serves as a standard reference for the study of gas giants within the solar system and beyond.
Kaspi notes also that earlier measurements didn’t account for Jupiter’s powerful winds. By including these extreme winds in their calculations, the Weizmann team cleared up long-standing discrepancies in earlier measurements. “It’s difficult to see what’s happening beneath the clouds of Jupiter, but the radio data give us a window into the depth of Jupiter’s zonal winds and powerful hurricanes,” Kaspi explains.